Service brief · Chapter III · Winding up an entity

Close an inactive OPC,cleanly and on the record.

An OPC that never took off, a solo venture that has run its course, or a small company being wound down as the owner moves to a new chapter. Each of these can be closed through a single filing to the Ministry, without going through winding-up proceedings.

Brief last revised · July 2026

I.
Part One

How the filing works

From the member's decision to the strike-off order on the MCA record.

Why this brief exists

Situations that bring people to this filing

An OPC has one shareholder and, in most cases, one director. When the founder decides to close it down, the process is simpler than for a multi-shareholder company. These are the four patterns behind almost every OPC closure filing:

  1. i.

    The OPC was set up but the venture never launched

    Many OPCs are incorporated with an idea in mind and the business never actually starts. No bank transactions, no invoices, no revenue. The OPC has been dormant since Day 1. Under Section 248(2), strike-off is available; if the two-financial-year inactivity condition is not yet met, the OPC waits for it.

    Close an OPC that never started
  2. ii.

    The business ran, and now it's over

    The OPC operated for some years, the founder decided to move on to a new venture, take up employment, or step back. Customers were transitioned or wound down, the last two financial years have been quiet. Strike-off is now available.

    Close an inactive OPC
  3. iii.

    Owner is emigrating or shifting focus

    The founder is moving abroad, joining a corporate role, or shifting focus to a different business (often a Pvt Ltd or LLP with co-founders). Continuing the OPC's compliance from outside India, or alongside a new venture, adds friction. Closing it cleanly avoids that ongoing burden.

    Close an OPC before a move
  4. iv.

    Converting the business to a different structure

    The business is growing and the founder wants to bring in a co-founder or investor. OPC cannot have more than one shareholder, so the choice is between conversion to a Pvt Ltd or closure and fresh incorporation. Where a fresh start makes more sense, the OPC is closed and a new Pvt Ltd is set up in parallel.

    Close an OPC being restructured
The filing

What STK-2 actually does

Section 248 of the Companies Act 2013, read with the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules 2016, allows a company to apply to the Registrar for removal of its own name. For an OPC, the application is made through STK-2.

STK-2 is filed with a package of supporting documents: the sole member's special resolution approving the closure, the nominee's written consent, a statement of accounts showing nil assets and nil liabilities, an indemnity bond (STK-3), an affidavit (STK-4), and bank account closure letters.

Once STK-2 is accepted, MCA publishes a notice of the proposed strike-off in the Official Gazette and on the MCA portal, inviting objections for 30 days. Where no objection is received, the Registrar issues STK-7, the formal strike-off order, and the OPC's CIN becomes inactive.

The documents involved

  • STK-2
    The main strike-off application. Filed with attachments, digitally signed by the sole director, and certified by a Practising Company Secretary.
  • STK-3
    Indemnity bond signed by the sole member (the shareholder), taking personal liability for any residual claim against the OPC that emerges after strike-off. Notarised.
  • STK-4
    Affidavit signed by the sole member, confirming that the OPC has no dues, has ceased business, is not a party to any litigation, and that all information given in STK-2 is true. Notarised.
  • STK-7
    Not filed by the company. Issued by the Registrar once the 30-day objection window closes without objection. This is the formal strike-off order.
Not every OPC qualifies

Who can strike off

The strike-off route is available only to OPCs that meet a specific set of eligibility conditions under Section 248 and the Rules. Checking these upfront saves the cost of a rejected application.

  • Two full financial years of inactivity

    The OPC must have failed to commence business within one year of incorporation, OR have been inactive for two consecutive financial years without applying for dormant company status. Inactivity means no business transactions on the bank account, no revenue, no operational engagement.

  • No liabilities and no creditors

    Every trade payable, employee due, statutory liability (GST, income tax, PT), and any contingent obligation must be settled. The statement of accounts must show nil liabilities. A single unpaid claim voids the strike-off application.

  • Annual filings up to date

    AOC-4 (annual financial statements) and MGT-7A (annual return for OPCs) for every year the OPC was active must be filed. DIR-3 KYC for the sole director must be current. MCA cross-checks the filing history before accepting STK-2.

  • No pending litigation

    The OPC must not be a party to any pending litigation, arbitration, or regulatory proceedings. Any active dispute has to conclude or be settled before strike-off can be applied for.

  • Both member and nominee agree

    The sole member must decide to strike off (recorded as a special resolution), and the nominee must consent in writing. Without the nominee's consent, the strike-off application cannot proceed. The nominee's role is limited to giving consent; they don't have veto rights on the closure decision.

From your side

Documents you will need to send

The paperwork is a package. Every piece has to line up before STK-2 can be filed.

About the OPC

  • Certificate of Incorporation and current MoA + AoA
  • Bank statements for every account the OPC ever held, with closure letters from each bank
  • Copies of all filed AOC-4s and MGT-7As (or acknowledgement that backlog is being caught up)
  • PAN, TAN, and GSTIN of the OPC with latest returns filed
  • Digital Signature Certificate of the sole director for signing STK-2

For the member and nominee

  • PAN, Aadhaar, and current address proof of both member and nominee
  • Special resolution of the sole member approving the closure
  • Written consent of the nominee to the strike-off
  • Signed and notarised STK-3 (indemnity bond) by the member
  • Signed and notarised STK-4 (affidavit) by the member
Step by step

Done within 90 to 120 days

Most OPC strike-offs land within three to four months of the first engagement. Timing depends on how fast bank accounts can be closed and how quickly the CA-certified statement of accounts can be prepared. The MCA side (gazette notice + strike-off order) is about 45 days once STK-2 is accepted.

  1. Days 1–3

    Briefing and eligibility check

    You share the OPC's details, its current status, the reason for closure. The eligibility check confirms two-financial-year inactivity, no outstanding liabilities, and the willingness of both the member and the nominee to proceed.

  2. Days 3–10

    Bank closure and statement of accounts

    The OPC's bank accounts are closed and closure letters obtained from every bank. A statement of accounts showing nil assets and nil liabilities on a date within 30 days of the STK-2 filing is drafted and certified by a Chartered Accountant.

  3. Days 10–15

    Member's decision, nominee consent, and affidavits

    The sole member records the decision to close in the form of a special resolution. The nominee's written consent to the closure is obtained. STK-3 (indemnity bond) and STK-4 (affidavit) are drafted and notarised in the member's name.

  4. Days 15–20

    STK-2 filed with MCA

    STK-2 is filed with all attachments: statement of accounts, STK-3, STK-4, special resolution, nominee consent, bank closure letters, and any backlog annual filings. Signed by the sole director and certified by a Practising Company Secretary.

  5. Days 20–120

    MCA public notice and strike-off order

    MCA publishes a public notice of the proposed strike-off in the Official Gazette, inviting objections for 30 days. Once the objection window closes and no valid objection is received, the Registrar issues STK-7 (the strike-off order) and the OPC's CIN becomes inactive.

What it costs

Our fee

What it costs, line by line

Starting at ₹9,000 for the strike-off filing.

  • Professional fee
    ₹9,000
    Per closure. Includes eligibility review, bank closure coordination, statement-of-accounts drafting, member's resolution + nominee consent + indemnity + affidavit, STK-2 preparation, PCS certification, and MCA follow-up until STK-7 is issued.
  • MCA filing fee
    ₹10,000
    Charged by MCA on STK-2. A flat statutory fee, higher than most other filings because strike-off is a substantive administrative act.
  • Chartered Accountant fee
    ₹3,000 – ₹7,000
    For certification of the statement of accounts. Typical range depends on the CA and the completeness of your books. Paid directly to the CA.
  • Notary and affidavit charges
    ₹500 – ₹1,500
    For notarisation of STK-3 (indemnity) and STK-4 (affidavit). Paid at the notary office; receipts retained for the filing.
  • Backlog AOC-4 / MGT-7A filings
    As applicable
    If the OPC has missed annual filings before winding down, those must be filed and their late fees paid before STK-2 is accepted. Quoted separately once the filing history is checked.

Your exact all-in number, including any backlog AOC-4 or MGT-7A filings that need to be caught up before STK-2, appears in the online form before any payment is taken.

After the strike-off order

What changes on the ground

Once STK-7 is issued, the OPC legally ceases to exist. But the closure of the entity does not close every associated record automatically. A few housekeeping items follow.

  • CIN marked struck off
    The OPC's CIN is marked struck off on the MCA master data. The OPC legally ceases to exist from the date of STK-7. Future annual filings (AOC-4, MGT-7A, DIR-3 KYC) are no longer required.
  • GSTIN surrender
    GST registration is surrendered by filing GST REG-16. Final GST returns for the period up to closure are filed. Any unutilised input tax credit is claimed as refund or lapses. Missing this leaves the GSTIN active and attracts return-non-filing notices.
  • PAN, TAN, and Income Tax records
    The OPC's PAN is surrendered to the Income Tax department. Final income tax return (ITR-6) for the period up to strike-off is filed. TAN is surrendered separately by filing the TAN surrender form.
  • Other registrations and licences
    IEC on DGFT portal, Udyam registration, Shop Act certificate, Professional Tax registration, and any industry-specific licence (FSSAI, drug licence, sector regulators) are surrendered on their respective portals.
  • Member's DIN status
    The member's DIN stays active and is not affected by strike-off. It can be used for any future company appointment. Annual DIR-3 KYC continues to be due unless the member also has no other directorships.
  • Statutory records retention
    The OPC's statutory registers, books of account, and past filings must be retained by the member for at least eight years from the strike-off date. Section 128 of the Companies Act requires this in case of any post-closure enquiry.
  • Personal liability under STK-3
    The indemnity bond signed by the member remains legally operative. Any pre-existing but undisclosed liability of the OPC that emerges within eight years can be recovered from the member personally. The eligibility check on the front side matters for this reason.
What goes wrong in practice

Common mistakes to avoid

OPC closures fail on the same handful of causes. Getting these right before starting the filing saves rework.

  • Filing without commencement declaration (INC-20A) being filed first

    Every OPC has to file INC-20A (declaration of commencement of business) within 180 days of incorporation. If it was never filed because the business never started, the OPC first files INC-20A with late fees, then proceeds with strike-off. Skipping INC-20A blocks STK-2 acceptance.

  • Statement of accounts stale or overstated

    The CA-certified statement of accounts must be dated within 30 days of STK-2 filing and must show genuinely nil assets and liabilities. Any residual balance in the bank, any capital not yet withdrawn, or any receivable being shown flags the filing as ineligible for strike-off.

  • Nominee consent missing or invalid

    The nominee's written consent is a mandatory attachment. Where the nominee has moved, is untraceable, or refuses to sign, the OPC first has to appoint a new nominee (using INC-4) before applying for strike-off. Nominee coordination is often the biggest logistical challenge.

  • Backlog annual filings not cleared

    AOC-4, MGT-7A, and DIR-3 KYC for every year the OPC was active must be current. Missed filings attract late fees (₹100 per day, up to twelve times the normal fee) and MCA rejects STK-2 until every backlog return is filed. Catch up the backlog first, then file for strike-off.

  • Signing STK-3 without understanding personal exposure

    The indemnity bond in STK-3 makes the member personally liable for any pre-existing but undisclosed liability of the OPC that emerges within eight years of strike-off. Members with contingent guarantees, unresolved tax positions, or contested contracts should think carefully before signing, or consider voluntary winding-up as a cleaner (though more expensive) alternative.

II.
Part Two

Understanding the closure

The structural background, read at your pace, in any order.

Two different closure routes

Strike-off vs winding up

The Companies Act 2013 provides two ways to end a company's legal existence. Choosing the right route is the first decision in a closure engagement.

i.

Strike-off under Section 248 (STK-2)

Available when the OPC has no liabilities, has been inactive, and both member and nominee agree. Administrative process, entirely with MCA. No court, no tribunal. 90 to 120 days. Covered in this brief.

ii.

Voluntary winding up under Section 271

For OPCs with creditors that need to be settled or contingent liabilities to be discharged. Requires special resolution by the member, appointment of a liquidator, tribunal approval of the final scheme. 8 to 18 months, much higher cost.

iii.

Compulsory winding up

Where the OPC is unable to pay its debts, has acted against national security, or on the tribunal's own order. Initiated by a creditor's petition or the government. Not a member-initiated option.

iv.

Dormant company status

An alternative to closure. Under Section 455, an inactive OPC can apply to be treated as 'dormant' by filing MSC-1. This preserves the CIN but reduces annual compliance to a minimal quarterly filing. Useful where future revival is likely.

A structural feature

The nominee's role in closure

Every OPC has a nominee. Section 3(1) of the Companies Act 2013 makes this mandatory: at incorporation, the sole member names a person who takes over as member if the current member dies or is incapacitated. The nominee's role is dormant until then.

On closure, the nominee's consent is a mandatory attachment to STK-2. The reason: the OPC could, in theory, be a future inheritance for the nominee, and the strike-off extinguishes that possibility. The Ministry treats the nominee as a stakeholder whose interest has to be acknowledged before closure.

  • Consent is a formal document

    The nominee signs a written consent stating that they are aware of the proposed strike-off and have no objection to it. Signature is witnessed but does not need to be notarised. If the nominee is out of India, a scanned consent is acceptable provided identity is verifiable.

  • If the nominee refuses

    The member can appoint a new nominee under Section 3(1) proviso before applying for strike-off. Form INC-4 is filed to record the change. Once the new nominee is in place and consents, the strike-off application proceeds.

  • If the nominee is untraceable

    Where the original nominee cannot be reached (moved abroad, lost contact, deceased without a substitute), the member appoints a new nominee first. Some Registrars accept an affidavit from the member explaining the situation, but a fresh nominee is the safer path.

A different option

Conversion versus closure

An OPC does not always have to be closed to be reorganised. Under the Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014, an OPC can convert into a Private Limited or a Public Limited company at any time. Since 2021, the conversion is voluntary; there is no size-based compulsion.

  • When conversion makes sense

    Where the founder wants to bring in a co-founder, take on investment, or restructure ownership. Conversion preserves the CIN, PAN, GSTIN, and every historical filing. The company continues with the same identity, just under a different form.

  • When closure makes sense

    Where the venture has genuinely ended, the founder wants a clean break, or the OPC has accumulated administrative complexity that a new incorporation would avoid. Closure ends the entity's obligations from the strike-off date.

  • Doing both in sequence

    Some founders close the OPC and start a fresh Pvt Ltd with co-founders. This is legitimate but the two events should not be linked in filings. The OPC closure runs on its own eligibility conditions; the new Pvt Ltd is a fresh incorporation with new CIN, new PAN, new bank account, new registrations.

The cost of doing nothing

Consequences of not closing a dormant OPC

An OPC that is inactive but not formally closed continues to attract compliance obligations. Every year that passes adds cost and legal exposure.

  • Annual filing fees continue to accrue

    AOC-4 and MGT-7A are due every year regardless of whether the OPC is trading. Missing them attracts a late fee of ₹100 per day per form, uncapped. Two years of missed filings on a single OPC can cross ₹73,000 in additional fees alone.

  • Director can be disqualified

    Under Section 164(2), a director of a company that has missed annual filings for three continuous financial years becomes disqualified from being appointed as a director in any company for five years. This applies to the sole director of the OPC. A real career-limiting risk.

  • MCA can strike off the OPC anyway

    Under Section 248(1), MCA can strike off a company that has not filed AOC-4 and MGT-7 for two consecutive years. This administrative strike-off is one-sided; the member has no control over timing or process, and the indemnity protection of a voluntary strike-off is not available.

  • Personal tax and creditor complications

    Even a dormant OPC can receive tax notices, GST notices, and be liable for state-level dues. The sole director has to respond to each notice. Where an OPC has been dormant for years, unresolved statutory notices are the most common post-hoc surprise.

  1. i.

    Fill the online form

    Save and resume anytime. No pressure to finish in one sitting.

  2. ii.

    Review the scope and fee

    The exact all-in fee, the timeline, and what's included appear together before any payment.

  3. iii.

    Filing begins

    Your dashboard tracks every step. Every form is signed and certified by a Practising Company Secretary.